The ultimate immorality
May 26, 2009
Trying to destroy a nation
through lies
By RALPH DOBRIN
All over the world there are a lot of people who are very angry with Israel – and that’s the truth. In 1948 hundreds of thousands of Arabs who had been living in Palestine became refugees – and that’s also the truth. Another truth is that Israel launched an intense military attack into the Gaza Strip on December 27, 2008, which lasted for about three weeks. I think that every rational person – no matter who and no matter where – can accept that these statements are true; they are all easily verifiable and the wording as such does not reflect any bias. They reflect The Truth.
But what exactly is The Truth? One doesn’t need to be a great thinker to know what is meant by the truth on a day-to-day level. After culling various dictionaries in order to get a concise definition, I think most people could agree that the truth about something requires exact conformity to fact or actuality. To this I would add that any notion or belief, no matter how strongly felt, doesn’t necessarily represent The Truth.
Now, apart from measurable items and certain things that have happened to me personally, I can’t really be sure that I have the absolute truth about very much. My life is based mainly on assumptions, most of which seem to work pretty well for me. For instance, I assume on the basis of what I’ve heard and read, that eating fresh fruit and vegetables is beneficial to our health; so is cutting down on meat and refined products. Also pollution and global warming are said to be real threats to our future. So, even though I don’t have the academic training to verify these claims myself, my common sense acknowledges that I should eat accordingly and also conserve electricity and water and gasolene usage for my transportation. In doing this I think that I am abiding by a growing consensus all over the world.
But let’s take a subject that doesn’t have a complete consensus – like the Holocaust. How can I be sure that the conventional view about the Nazi genocide of Jews in Europe does indeed reflect The Truth? After all, I wasn’t in Europe during those terrible years. And maybe controversial historian David Irving, or Bishop Williamson or President Ahmedinijad have actually got it right when they declare that the Holocaust is really a hoax. But as a Jew my immediate reaction is that these prominent people are very wrong. On the other hand, if I take into consideration the tendency for bias that most of us have as a result of years of mental conditioning, I should consider that as a Jew I might actually have a distorted view of the events of the thirties and forties of the last century. Let’s face it, more and more people throughout the world agree that the claim of Holocaust is a lie. Can they be right? Let’s see if we can check it out as honestly and objectively as possible.
Firstly, the Holocaust was thoroughly documented by the typically orderly German government itself. After the Nazi defeat, millions of documents were found by the Allied forces, recording the transports to labor and death camps, as well as the daily numbers of Jews killed and where these killings took place. The Nazis had also produced films on the killings.Furthermore, overwhelming evidence was given by survivors and liberating soldiers on the death camps, gas chambers and mass killings.
Also, Post-World War II Germany has fully accepted that during the Nazi regime, about six million of Jewish civilians throughout Europe were murdered. If the Holocaust deniers were indeed right, would Germany as an official, free and independent state be willing to admit to such an inordinately heinous legacy?
There are many issues in life that one can’t prove in accordance with absolute, scientifically conducted criteria. Often, the best that the individual can do about certain vital issues, is to conclude without a reasonable doubt – in the same way that is accepted in a court of law. And if I also consider the countless other readily accessible data regarding the Nazi period, it is clear that David Irving, Bishop Williams and the President of Iran, together with all the other Holocaust deniers are in fact engaging in falsehood.
But the lie of Holocaust denial is taken one step further. Israel is accused of doing to the Arabs what the Nazis had done to the Jews. And again, let’s not jump to immediate conclusions – let’s consider that maybe this is indeed The Truth. After all, huge crowds of people often take part in massive protest demonstrations against Israel, not only in Arab and Islamic countries but in Europe and the whole American continent. So, there must be something to justify their indignation against the Jewish state.
One of the accusations against Israel is that it is an aggressor nation. On the face of it this seems to be a valid statement. After all, Israel has often acted aggressively against Arab countries. This is the Truth and I would be lying if I said otherwise.
But what should be asked is: does it make sense for Israel, with a population of a mere six million Jews to take on the whole Arab world, now hovering at the 300 million mark, thus making it about fifty times more populous than Israel – and possessing a large part of the world’s oil reserves. There are other factors in the Israel-Arab conflict which clearly put Israel at a ridiculously impossible disadvantage. So, are the Jews of Israel crazy to be fighting Arabs, which includes enraging a large part of the rest of the billion-strong Muslim world?
No, the Jews are not crazy. Neither are they deluded about any superhuman abilities or convinced that the Messiah will appear and save them. Furthermore, they are not intrinsically an aggressive nation. But they are forced to defend themselves against the continuing Arab quest to uproot Jewish sovereignty from the sliver of land that constitutes a tiny fraction of the original Palestine. For over 90 years Arabs have attacked Jews in their ancient homeland. At first the Jews were quite helpless against the assaults and the killings. But they quickly learned how to defend themselves. Since Israel’s Declaration of Statehood, neighboring Arab states have twice launched full-scale invasions against Israel and once (in 1967) were arrayed on Israel’s vulnerable borders for yet another invasion which was pre-empted by Israel in order to prevent the annihilation that the Arabs had promised over and over again. Apart from the invasions, there has been hardly a single day when an Arab country or terrorist organization wasn’t bombarding Israeli towns and villages with rockets or sending terrorist squads to cause mayhem, or engaged in the planning and preparation of a future onslaught.
This is a very brief background to why Israel has needed to act aggressively from time to time. (Incidentally from the outset, Arab aggression against Israel has always led to more and more misery of Arabs. The Arab refugee problem was totally unnecessary and would never have happened had they not launched a war of annihilation against the Jews in the first place. This is a Truth that very few people mention.)
Anyone who ignores Arab aggression against Israel in this conflict is in fact engaging in selective omission. That’s the same as falsehood. That’s being a party to lies. And there are plenty more false accusations that are constantly directed at Israel by the Arabs, their fellow-Muslims, and shamefully, by a large percentage of people in Europe and the Americas.
An accusation echoed frequently at anti-Israel demonstrations around the world and in almost every international forum, is that Israel is an apartheid state. Well, if Israel were really an apartheid state, then the Arabs in Israel (20% of the population) would not be free to visit restaurants, cinemas, beaches, nor vote in national elections. A dozen highly vituperative Arab representatives are members in Israel’s Knesset. If Israel is really an apartheid state, then how can the number of Arab students at Israel’s universities reflect the ratio of the general population? How can there be Arab lecturers and professors teaching Jewish students? How can there be any Arab patients in Israel’s hospitals, and Arab doctors as well as Arab heads of departments? So, accusing Israel of being an apartheid state is yet another of the multitude of crude lies intended to depict Israel as a pariah state and isolate it even more, thus advancing its planned destruction.
Another common accusation is that Israel is expansionist and wants to conquer Arab lands! But if Israel is expansionist, then why did it cede the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt, not once but on three separate occasions – each time after Sinai had previously been used as a staging point by Egypt for invasions against Israel? Similarly, if Israel were expansionist, why did its armed forces withdraw from a large part of Judea and Samaria (aka West Bank) in the framework of the Oslo Peace Accords? Here too, the army has needed to return from time to time to the ceded areas in order to cope with the intense terrorist activity. We have seen exactly the same pattern regarding Lebanon. Clearly, claiming that Israel is expansionist is yet another crude fabrication.
TERRIBLE IMAGES OF GAZA
But let’s face it – the recent war in Gaza, seen on TV screens around the world, showed without a shadow of doubt that Israel launched countless airstrikes on Gaza, together with large tank and infantry incursions. The colossal devastation was upsetting and infuriating to any decent, caring person, no matter who and no matter where. Cameras do not lie. But they don’t tell the whole story. For that one needs unbiased newspaper, radio and TV journalists, presenting honest background commentary.
However, the terrible scenes on TV screens around the world, showing what Israel wrought on Gaza, seldom if ever related to the preceding eight years of constant rocket attacks coming from the Gaza Strip against Israel’s southern towns and villages. It’s hard for someone not living in Israel, especially not close to the border with Gaza, to appreciate the horrors of daily barrages of rocket fire on ordinary civilians. This was the grim reality faced by Israel’s southern citizens. The situation was totally unacceptable and any other sovereign state would have retaliated far more promptly. But few media outlets related seriously to these long-lasting attacks on Israeli citizens. Terrorist squads from Gaza would attack Israeli towns and villages on a daily basis. But it was only when Israel retaliated, that the media focussed on the conflict, spurring decent, concerned folks of the Western World to voice their understandable indignation against Israel. Few demonstrators fully realized (or wanted to be informed) that Israel’s invasion into Gaza was launched because nothing else had stopped the rockets (not even the complete withdrawal of every Jewish presence from the Gaza Strip in 2006).
Also, largely ignored by most of the international media was the Hamas tactic of forcing their own people to be human shields, using homes, mosques and schools as firing positions, as was the fact that Gaza had been rendered virtually unassailable by any means, because of the enormous amount of booby trapping and tunnels within and under private homes. Only concerted armed incursion and air strikes could halt the terror against Israel. Failure to relate to all these factors meant that only part of the Israel-Gaza war was told. It was indeed an exercise in selective omission and as part of the overall conflict, a large part of a large part of humanity is constantly being duped.
GLOBAL IMMORALITY
The reality is that Israel, one of the smaller nations in the world is trying desperately to prevent yet another genocide on its people, while being hamstrung by international sanctions, boycotts and censure every time it tries to defend itself. Also, unlike any other nation facing constant military aggression, Israel is invariably restricted in its scope to defend itself by it’s supposed friends when it needs to prevent military aggression or retaliate.
What can one conclude about a world in which people who are being constantly attacked and threatened with annihilation are paradoxically the ones who are branded as the aggressors and prevented from defending themselves adequately? How can one define a world in which readily exposed lies are accepted as the truth, and thus further the aims of genocide? A word that sums up the whole tragic situation is Immorality!
Like any other country, Israel is far from having a perfect society and not everything done by its citizens, leaders or its defence forces is above reproach. Like any other country, Israel is most certainly open to criticism. But there is a difference between valid criticism and condemnation based on lies, half-truths and selective omission. No other country in the world faces continuous condemnation in the various forums of the United Nations as well as by the international media, universities, trade unions and some of the mainline churches.
The caring, honest person should ask himself or herself a question regarding Israel: am I being duped by falsehood or am I indeed spreading lies. Can it be that I have been corrupted by self-righteous snares of political correctness or influenced by sloppy, biased journalism or possibly it’s anti-Semitism that’s influenced my perception. Or most dismayingly, if my ancestry is Hebraic, could it be that Jewish self-hate has warped my attitude?
It is important, not only for Israelis, but for every person who cares about the future, to realize that the charters of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the terror armies of Hamas, Hizbollah and El Khaida, make it abundantly clear that the existence of the the State of Israel will continue to be vehemently and violently opposed. Iran, now poised to acquire military nuclear capability is a moving force within this unholy alliance, which is condoned or supported by a large part of the rest of the Arab and Muslim world.
Finally, this mortal conflict doesn’t just concern Israel and the Arabs and Muslims of the world. Those charters make it clear that Israel is just the beginning of the latter-day jihadic conquest of the infidel nations by Islam. What happens now will have a crucial bearing on the future of humanity as a whole. A major tool in this jihad is the spread of lies, half-truths and selective omission. For all this falsehood to be effective, it needs patsies. Conversely, in order to ensure a sane, wholesome world people need to stop being patsies and reject and oppose the falsehood. As an honest, honorable person, I’m sure you are making the right choice.
For more on the subject of truth: http://www.israelandtruth.org/truth_1.htm
Entry Filed under: dangeous lies and halftruths. Tags: Arab, arab invasion, falsehood, Gaza, half-truths, Israel, lies, selective omission, survival, terror, truth, war.
2 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Ilana Levy | May 27, 2009 at 8:36 am
Kol Hakavod !
Rafi ,you have written a well balanced article on THE TRUTH .
Hopefully many more will read and understand the immoral treatment shown towards the nation of Israel and her inhabitants.
Ilana Levy
Israel
2.
Jerry Yariq | May 28, 2009 at 6:18 pm
GAZA WAR CRIMES
in CONTEXT OF LAST 1400 YEARS
The paragraphs following this short
introduction were written in early April.
I have since visited some Israeli web sites
including those listing the lyrics, of
“Hayalim Almonim” (חיילים אלמונים)
written anc composed in 1932 by
Abraham Stern (Yair). Out of context it
seemed disproportionately extreme:
In rough translation, the first few lines state:
Anonymous soldiers we are without uniforms
surrounded by terror, in the shadow of death
We were all recruited for the rest of our lives
From the line will release only death
Inred days of pogroms and blood
in the dark nights of of despair
In cities and villages our banner we’ll raise
Upon which Defend Conquer
The “death” part and the “Conquer” part
may seem repugnant to many Jews and
Gentiles, until you examine the history of
Arab, mainly Islamic massacres of Jews
in Safed, Hebron, Jerusalem and Motza.
This was long before Israel became
independent. Jews who subsequently
took up arms to defend themselves
faced execution by the British rulers.
The massacres were not isolated.
They were part of an Islamic campaign
started 1400 years before Hitler and, while
far less efficient never stopped.
Now for more contemporary context:
Eminent Advocate, Judge, Professor and
International Court of Justice Prosecutor
Richard Goldstone is a Legal Mercenary
extraodinaire in the Cause of Goldstone
rather than the cause of Justice.
During the period 1992 to 1994, Goldstone
headed the “Goldstone Commission” into
various aspects of violence and intimidation
in South Africa.
The Commission investigated, inter-alia
the “Shell House Massacre” of 28 March,
1994, when ANC (The Government in Waiting),
gunmen, Killed 19 IFP Marchers outside
“Shell House” (Now Albert Luthuli House).
Bravely and impartially “The Commission has
decided that it would be premature at this
stage to establish a committee to hear
evidence on these shootings.” See:
http://www.hurisa.org.za/Goldstone/Goldstone_Reports.htm
Why?
In the words of Bob Dylan:
“The answer, my friend, is blowing in
the wind, the answer is blowing in the
wind.
Richard Goldstone is now to head a “fact
finding mission” under the auspices of the UN
HRC into alleged “war crimes committed by
Israel in Gaza”. UN HRC is dominated by Muslim
states opposed to the existence of Israel.
Careful examination of some of the UN HRC
underlying religious agenda dictated by the
Muslim sponsors of the “fact finding mission”
is that they are also strongly opposed to
the existence of Jews. This can be
corroborated by the words of the
Egyptian Islamic cleric who explains
(see below) that the conflict is not
really about Palestine or land, but
about Jews.
For those who might be too startled by that
revelation to believe it, it might be
an eye-opener to realise that fundamentalist
Muslims are also opposed to the existence of
all other Non-Muslims regardless of the
other’s religion..
Politically or religiously motivated
“fact finding missions” have the nasty habit
of having their “facts’ pre-defined and
pre-decided beforehand and the
“investigation” usually serves to to
give credence to what was previously
defined by their mandate.
For the reasons flowing from the investigation
of the unrelated 28 March 1994 “Shell House
Massacre”, Goldstone is an Ideal candidate
to lead such an “investigation”. SA during
“transition” was the Ideal training ground.
In a world where Jews are vastly outnumbered
by Christians and Muslims, Richard Goldstone,
for the right client, is definitely worth
his weight in Gold..stone.
Poor Judas Iscariot had to settle for a mere
thirty pieces of silver in bounty.
Just imagine, how much more opportune,
expedient, and profitable it is, to sell out,
not one Jew, but a whole nation of Jews.
Iscariotism globalised. Wholesale distribution.
The Christians are unlikely to be disturbed
by this phenomenon. Finding the Jews guilty
of real, or more likely, imagined war crimes
and atrocities would help them ease their
conscience. After having participated in
the wholesale slaughter of more than six
million Jews during the “Holocaust”, or
having acquiesced with the slaughter, or
simply having stood by without doing much
to stop the slaughter, how convenient and
comforting it is if we can say “The Jews
are not really better than us”.
The Muslims are ready and eager buyers. Their
commitment for a genocide against the Jews is
repeated, in writing, in Article Seven of the
Hamas Covenant (or Charter) as follows:
” the Islamic Resistance Movement aspires to the
realisation of Allah’s promise, no matter how
long that should take. The Prophet, Allah bless
him and grant him salvation, has said:
“The Day of Judgement will not come about until
Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when
the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The
stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla,
there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.”…”
(English translation at:
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp)
For those horrified by news clips and videos
from the recent conflict in Gaza, there are
simple points to remember:
Hamas chose to operate against the Israelis
from civilian populated areas, schools,
mosques and hospitals making extensive use
of human shields.
The amount of force and munitions expended
by Israel in Gaza would have sufficed to
kill a quarter of a million civilians, had
Israel chosen to deliberately target any
non-combatant civilians.
In view of Hamas, allegedly supported by
a “Democratic Majority” of Gazans repeatedly
stated commitment to genocide against the
Jews, it can be fairly stated that Israel
had used a disproportionately underwhelming
force.
To gain a better understanding of the
background to the conflict, please
follow the links below:
The root causes of the Gaza conflict in less than 6 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrmhmXwTFWA
It is not about land or occupation
Egyptian Cleric – Genocide The Jews
(Jan 2009)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNj3xQRBl6U
Muhammad was the First Islamic Terrorist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ5yycE44qU
Who is Hamas?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgW3zFEYiFQ
Hamas plans for the Jews
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKeAVBYAbn0
“Occupation” is not really the reason
only the pretext.
Hamas children
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTGbP55HGi8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xR8Tfd0i4lY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIBNRVgq59Y
Suicide Bombing In Islamabad
Where are the “Zionist Occupiers” to blame?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXZ881teNZc
Karbala Arbaáin – suicide attack Feb 13/2009
surprise surprise
Not a “Zionist” or a “Palestinian” in sight!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31xHaiwO7K4
Religious tolerance Islamic Style:
Sunnys go for the Shites. Shites go
sunny-side up.
Shites go for the Sunnys, and Sunnys go
belly-up.
When it comes to religious tolerance, there
are plenty of (mainly newly erected) mosques
in Eurabia and Islamerica.
There are many churches and mosques in
Israel. Some of the mosques, though,
were built by Muslims over former churches
during periods of Muslim occupation.
In 1948, The Hassan Bek mosque minaret on
the fringes of Jaffa and overlooking
Tel-Aviv was used by Arab snipers against
Israelis. The “Irgun” captured the mosque
and planted demolition charges there.
This was stopped by Menachem Begin, their
then commander.
Palestinian Muslim militants were not
deterred by the sacred religious status
of churches and mosques and in 2002 used
the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem
as refuge resulting in a lengthy siege
until most were forced into exile after
handing over their weapons to the Israelis.
Until recently the Israelis avoided hitting
mosques or churches even when their
religious status was abused by the
Palestinians. This is no longer the case.
In the latest Gaza conflict, the Israelis
did hit some mosques, but only those used
by Hamas to fire from, launch rockets and
mortars from or used to store arms
ammunition and explosives.
How many churches or synagogues are there
in Saudi Arabia?
How many Hindu Temples are there in Saudi
Arabia?
Except for the Kaaba which was
originally a Hindu Temple until
plundered by Mohamed there are none.